08-EnduranceTriumph1by Kingsley L Dennis

‘I am not of the East, nor of the West/Not of the land, not of the sea/Neither of this world, nor of the next/My place is placeless, my trace traceless.’


What the opening quote by Rumi hints at is that our true dwelling place does not exist in any physical location but is an integral part of a Reality that is placeless. However, as we currently exist in a physical time-place reality, it appears we are faced with a conundrum. In the first essay of this trilogy[i] I discussed how we often feel an urge toward something that is seemingly ‘beyond us’ and how we act upon this shapes the pattern of our lives. I spoke of how the ‘interior life’ recognizes that it is the essential nature of being human to seek for communion with something greater than ourselves. Also, how this fundamental need for a meaningful, developmental life has still not been met by our societies. In the second essay[ii] I mentioned that various wisdom teachings have operated within humanity for millennia with the aim of impacting and altering our individual, and sometimes collective, level of perception. And that there have been many instances of people experiencing altered states through either artificial means, shock incidents, and by other random experiences. Humankind, it was stated, is engaged on a path of conscious evolutionary development, which induces such capacities as the creative imagination.  Such paths, I suggested, have been known by various names, one of them being the perennial path, or perennial tradition. Yet regardless of the outer naming, they all share basic similar fundamentals. One of these is the necessity to develop an ‘integral self’ that, on one level, functions as a balanced vessel for the receiving and assimilation of impacts and finer perceptions, as I shall discuss in this essay.

According to this perennial path, or tradition, the human being is normally cut off from contact with objective, genuine Reality, and only perceives upon a limited, restricted wavelength. The result of this is that we generally end up perceiving secondary effects and considering them as primary. Another aspect shared between the perennial traditions is that humankind is psychologically unbalanced – afflicted with dis-ease – as people are unable to perceive not only who they really are but also what the truth of their situation is. One philosopher directly referred to this as the terror of the situation.[iii] Common language often used in this respect is to refer to humanity as being largely ‘blind’ or ‘asleep’ because its latent, higher capacity is underdeveloped. In the same context, the development of the necessary perception is often referred to as ‘awakening,’ and it is to the science of awakening that such perennial traditions, regardless of their external name, have addressed. In some respects we are at the mercy of our psyche, which is critical to the notion of an integral self.

The human psyche has, in relatively modern times, operated through a predominant linear processing that tends to view the external world in terms of separate, non-connected events. It is a manner of perception which has cut us off from a much broader spectrum of relations and has contributed to a system of thought – including science, religion, morality, ethics, and more – that is, to put it simply, restricted and constricting. The human heritage of a whole, integral perspective has been denied to the majority of us during the recent history of our species. It is for this reason that many ancient teachings include stories, tales, allegories, and similar mediums that serve to stimulate left-right brain functioning, from which integral perspective – or consciousness – is activated. According to philosopher and linguist Jean Gebser, who studied the structures of human consciousness, we have recently shifted from a mental period of consciousness (which he associates with the ‘decline of the West’) towards an integral structure of consciousness. This new integral consciousness brings with it a new relationship to space and time. Given our current state of global technologies – our instant communications and connectivity – then this would appear a prescient prediction. Our perception of events in space and time is now broadened to encompass a planetary perspective and a ‘longer term’ view that understands the need for ecological maintenance as well as the longevity of the human species. This latter issue is now emerging in recent enterprises that seek to place a human colony on Mars[iv], space tourism[v], as well as the mining of off-planet resources. This integral consciousness, I propose, is shifting human perceptions from a linear, horizontal model into a more spatial awareness.

Of course, this is not a recent phenomenon. Since the dawn of humanity the human species has been staring into the starry heavens and imagining all kinds of wonders and gods. Yet the modes of prior consciousness structures were not compelled toward conscious participation. The stars and heavens whirled in their orbits beyond the capacity for human participation. Prior structures of human consciousness, despite immense creative imagination, remained largely within a ‘horizontal’ perspective which depicted the primary relationship as between the individual and its environment (society/Nature), as the following diagram illustrates:

Individual/Humanity <——————————–> Society/Nature

Such a linear, horizontal model relationship reflected a limited perspective. Whilst the human mind recognized, analyzed, and interpreted the cosmos, it did not particularly feel a kinship with it. We did not possess a participatory consciousness. The integral mode of consciousness that is now becoming more dominant – within a techno-cultural global civilization – recognizes a wider temporal-spatial spectrum. We could, to use a well-known phrase, refer to this as activating a ‘cosmic consciousness.’ That is, a perspective which perceives that humanity is not, and never has been, separated or cut off from a cosmic context. Thus, the relationship can be interpreted, albeit crudely, as:

Cosmos-E.This integral relationship is at the same time more vertical and at once more spatial. It not only accurately represents an integral consciousness but also the perspective that has long been offered by the perennial wisdom traditions.